Anybody catch Daniel's column last Friday in the technician? I ran into Daniel the other day, and we shared emails. I sent him the following plug and clarification of the whole liberal conservative labelling issue. It runs as follows and provides some insight into my screen name and blog title.
I've got a book (short, 130 pgs. written at a 6th grade reading level) for you called "Are You Liberal, Conservative, or Confused?" by Richard Maybury. www.bluestockingpress.com, but I'll lend you mine, if you like.
A few selections in response to Friday's column:
Liberals believe you should have privacy in your social conduct, but not in your economic conduct. Conservatives grant privacy in your economic conduct but not in your social conduct. Thr right wants to use force to stamp out immorality. The left wants to use it to stamp out inequality of wealth. A Moderate compromises. Borrowing from both left and right, he wishes to control both your economic conduct and your social conduct. Moderates will allow you more economic freedom than liberals and more social freedom than conservatives but they want to keep a close eye on both areas. They don't like privacy. Both Republicans and Democrats are closer to Moderates than either extreme Liberals (socialists), or extreme Conservatives (fascists). This is where they perceive the bulk of the votes to be. The other Middle View is Juris Naturalism. Juris Naturalists are the opposite of Moderates, they combine the left's desire for liberty in social affairs and the right's desire for liberty in economic affairs. Juris naturalism never is found on the Left to Right spectrum of political ideals. This is because the spectrum contains no place for it. From far left to far right its all statist. Juris naturalists are terrified of political power, and consider it the most evil drug ever discovered.
Nathan